Google Used It’s Money And Power To Influence The 2016 Presidential Elections for Hillary.

All the media talks about is Russia’s attempted influence in our elections.  They rely on “anonymous” sources to spew this venom to America. Is this just a cover-up and attempt to divert the attention from Google and it’s attempted influence in the Presidential elections? Did the Hillary Campaign disclose the help it received from Google in its donations to the FEC?

We The Peoples news reported Google’s influence in our elections earlier this year in Google Worked For The DNC During 2016 Presidential Elections!!  We have also reported that Hillary Laundered 84 million dollars which were brought to the FEC’s attention and ignored by FEC though by law the FEC was supposed to investigate which it failed to do prompting this laws suit Lawsuit Filed Against The FEC Alledges, Hilliary Funneled $84 Million Illegal Campaign Contributions Through The DNC

More truth about Google’s help and attempt to influence our 2016 Presidential elections in favor of Hillary has surfaced. The video is a full recording of Google’s first all-hands meeting following the 2016 election. The Video features co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin, VPs Kent Walker and Eileen Naughton, CFO Ruth Porat, and CEO Sundar Pichai. Co-founder Sergey Brin can be heard comparing Trump supporters to fascists and extremists. Brin argues that like other extremists, Trump voters were motivated by “boredom,” which he says in the past led to fascism and communism.  This is disturbing and Google used its money and power to HELP Hillary Win Then accuses those who voted for Trump of Fascism!

It is amazing that the largest search engine company in the world is painting those who voted for Trump as fascist. This is bias at the Top levels of google. They will bash Americans and at the same time built censorship programs for Communist China.

The Intercept reports in GOOGLE CHINA PROTOTYPE LINKS SEARCHES TO PHONE NUMBERS “GOOGLE BUILT A prototype of a censored search engine for China that links users’ searches to their personal phone numbers, thus making it easier for the Chinese government to monitor people’s queries.

The search engine, codenamed Dragonfly, was designed for Android devices and would remove content deemed sensitive by China’s ruling Communist Party regime, such as information about political dissidents, free speech, democracy, human rights, and peaceful protest.

Previously undisclosed details about the plan, obtained by The Intercept on Friday, show that Google compiled a censorship blacklist that included terms such as “human rights,” “student protest,” and “Nobel Prize” in Mandarin.”

And they have the nerve to call those who voted for Donald Trump Facist? Is Dragonfly the model that Google wants for the world?

The Google Transparency Project Reported in Google’s Support for Hillary Clinton

“Google executives and employees bet heavily on a Clinton victory, hoping to extend the company’s influence on the Obama White House. ”

“Google’s executives and employees employed a variety of strategies to elect Hillary Clinton and defeat Donald Trump. Google permeated Clinton’s sphere of influence on a broad scale, rivaling the influence it exerted over the Obama administration. A review found at least 57 people were affiliated with both Clinton—in her presidential campaign, in her State Department, at her family foundation—and with Google or related entities. In addition, 10 people who worked under Clinton at the State Department later joined the New America Foundation, a Google-friendly think tank where Google’s Eric Schmidt served as chairman and was one of its top donors. ”

New America (organization) claims it is a non-partisan think tank in the United States, but New America has been criticised for its close links with Google.  Executive Chairman, Eric Schmidt, is the chairman of the foundation’s board of directors.

The organization provides fellowships to “foster the next generation of thinkers and public intellectuals” through the Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows program. The fellowship “supports talented journalists, academics and other public policy analysts who offer a fresh and often unpredictable perspective on the major challenges facing our society”.[23] Alumni of the program include Jacob HackerMegan McArdleKatherine BooRobert WrightTim WuChris HayesRomesh RatnesarDavid Auerbach, and Dayo Olopade. ALL LIBERAL PROGRESSIVE REPORTERS!!

With 140 donors in 2013, the top donors, giving more than $1,000,000 each, were the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Lumina FoundationEric and Wendy Schmidt, and the US Department of State. Do not be fooled this is activism hidden under the guise of a non-profit

google helplaunch1launch 2

This is Eric Schmidt and John Podesta. Here they describe the help Google is willing to give and it is big! Here is another email from Eric Schmidt forwarded by John Podesta to Cheryl Mills. It shows how much this Company that controls 67% of online searches was willing to spend to help get Hillary elected

googlebudget 1budget

Did Hillary report this help as campaign contributions as requires by law? Trumps’s personal attorney Micheal Cohen is facing prison for such an offense and it was a tiny fraction compared to what Google purposed spending for Hillary. The law states:

According to 52 U.S. Code § 30118 – Contributions or expenditures by national banks, corporations, or labor organizations

“(a)In general

It is unlawful for any national bank, or any corporation organized by authority of any law of Congress, to make a contribution or expenditure in connection with any election to any political office, or in connection with any primary election or political convention or caucus held to select candidates for any political office, or for any corporation whatever, or any labor organization, to make a contribution or expenditure in connection with any election at which presidential and vice presidential electors or a Senator or Representative in, or a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, Congress are to be voted for, or in connection with any primary election or political convention or caucus held to select candidates for any of the foregoing offices, or for any candidate, political committee, or other person knowingly to accept or receive any contribution prohibited by this section, or any officer or any director of any corporation or any national bank or any officer of any labor organization to consent to any contribution or expenditure by the corporation, national bank, or labor organization, as the case may be, prohibited by this section.

(b)Definitions; particular activities prohibited or allowed


For the purposes of this section the term “labor organization” means any organization of any kind, or any agency or employee representation committee or plan, in which employees participate and which exists for the purpose, in whole or in part, of dealing with employers concerning grievances, labor disputes, wages, rates of pay, hours of employment, or conditions of work.


For purposes of this section and section 79l(h) of title 15,[1] the term “contribution or expenditure” includes a contribution or expenditure, as those terms are defined in section 30101 of this title, and also includes any direct or indirect payment, distribution, loan, advance, deposit, or gift of money, or any services, or anything of value
The part in Red is what Cohen plead guilty to. Now I ask how this is different?
Did Hillary claim the 1.5 billion Google used to help her win? Tucker Carlson from Fox has acquired an email that a senior Google company employee deployed the companies resources to increase voter turn out in ways she believed would help the Clinton Campaign win in the last election. This was an effort to boost Hispanic turnout. The email bragged that Google used its power to ensure that millions of people saw certain hashtags and social media impression with the goal of INFLUENCING THERE BEHAVIOR DURING THE  ELECTIONS.
latino vote
Voto Latino is a 501 (c) 3 nonprofit, nonpartisan organization. Yet it paid for rides for Latinos to go vote for Hillary. They are required to report donations but fail to do so. They considered this a “silent donation”.  Google promoted these rides through ad campaigns.
voto latino
Although the company and its chairman, Eric Schmidt, were ultimately unsuccessful in electing Clinton, their efforts underscore the profound and novel ways a corporation can influence our democracy beyond simple financial donations.
Could this be why the “Russian Collusion Propaganda” dominated headlines on Cable news? CNN bragged they did all they could to help Hillary. Did Hillary report their “contribution” of help once again pointed put by We The Peoples News in:
Google actually thinks it is their job to control what we see. They are trying to influence how Americans think. Did 12 Russians really have the effect Google did in our 2016 elections? To believe that is insane. Why is the media ignoring this huge story?
“Now think about this as Google’s high ups call us fascist and in reality, were trying to influence the elections themselves. They believe Trump is “dangerous” and a “threat to America” I would say they are the threat to freedom.
Eliana Murillo, Google’s Multicultural Marketing department head email.
“We worked very hard. Many people did. We pushed tp get out the Latino vote with our features, our partners, and our voices. We kept our Google efforts non-partisan and followed our company’s protocols for the elections strategy. We emphasized our mission to give Latinos access to information so that they can make an informed decision at the polls, and we feel very grateful for all the support to do this important work. Latinos voted in record-breaking numbers, particularly with early votes. A large percentage of Latino voters in Florida were new voters who had become citizens just in time to vote. We saw high traffic for the search queries ‘votar,’ ‘como votar,’ and ‘donde voter,’ in key states like Florida and Nevada. We will be pulling in more info in the coming hours/days but so far we definitely know there was high traffic on search in Spanish. Without translating our tools the users wouldn’t have found the information they needed. Objectively speaking, our goal was met — we pushed and successfully launched the search features in Spanish, and we thank Lisa for her support in advocating  for this work. I sent Philipp a note yesterday to thank him because he and others voiced their support for this too, and we greatly appreciate it. Even Sundar gave the effort a shout out and a comment in Spanish, which was really special.
We had our partners help spread the word about our features on social media, including YouTubers and influencers like Dulce Candy, Jorge Narvaez, Jessie y Joy, Barbara Bermudo, and Pamela Silva of Univision, Jackie Cruz aka La Flaca from Orange is the New Black, and more. We promoted our partner the Latino Community Foundation’s non-partisan #YoVoyaVotaryTu (I’m going to vote, are you?) campaign and leveraged our social media influencer friends’ reach to hit over 11M impressions with that hashtag. We hosted an event with over 200 people and a hangout with social media influencers about the power of the Latino vote and the new research Nielsen published about the Latino electorate. This reached 4.4M social media impressions and signaled to many that Google and our partners value the Latino community and our role in this election. We brought the same research to the LATISM conference, where people were beyond thrilled to see Google’s support and acknowledgment of the Latino community.
We also supported partners like Voto Latino to pay for rides to the polls in key states (silent donation). We even helped them create ad campaigns to promote the rides (with support from HOLA folks who rallied and volunteered their time to help). We supported Voto Latino to help them land an interview with Senator Meza of Arizona (key state for us) to talk about the election and how to use Google search to find information about how to vote. They were a strong partner, among many in this effort.
Ultimately, after all was said and done, the Latino community did come out to vote, and completely surprised us,” Murillo wrote. “We never anticipated that 29% of Latinos would vote for Trump. No one did. We saw headlines like this about early voter turn out and thought that this was finally the year that the ‘sleeping giant’ had awoken.
The voters we wanted to reach did end up having an influence in the end, most notably in Florida. Latino voters voted for Trump more in Florida than in other states (31%), and FL was critical by popular vote and the electoral college. We’ll keep an eye on any other results that can show us the influence that our efforts had on the election. We know we gave this our best and are now figuring out what comes next. Thanks again for all your help and support in this effort.
I have tried to stay objective, but I ask that you please give us some time to pause and reflect,” Murillo wrote. “This is devastating for our Democratic Latino community. After all these efforts and what we thought was positive momentum toward change, the results are not what we expected at all. We are afraid for our families, and especially for the millions of immigrants who now don’t know what the future holds for them.
What’s most difficult for us is we can’t even email the HOLA list to reach our community and discuss what this means for us because we know that apparently, some may actually be Trump supporters. There is a thread right now among the core HOLA group where people are sharing how much they hurt, how much they need support right now, and that they are coordinating in different offices to meet up to just hold each other. One in a remote office said ‘If you guys do any sort of meetings, I’d love to join virtually. I think I’m currently the only Latinx in my office. It’s kinda hard.’ #understatement. Another said, ‘I’ve never cried after an election until last night.’ Same here.
I’m in shock and it hurts more than I could have ever imagined, but trying to stay optimistic and keep my head high,” Murillo wrote. “Loss is a part of life, and I do think frustrations challenge us to work smarter and get creative. My partners have sent notes and are saying the same thing — time to keep working harder.
I’m not sharing my personal opinions very broadly, but wanted to share openly here in the circle of trust.”

Left: Eric Schmidt at Clinton’s election night rally in New York, wearing a staff badge. Right: An enlargement of Schmidt’s staff badge on election night.
Left: Eric Schmidt at Clinton’s election night rally in New York, wearing a staff badge. Right: An enlargement of Schmidt’s staff badge on election night.

Several outside firms connected to Google also worked on the Clinton 2016 campaign. Those included Civis Analytics and The Groundwork, two companies that compiled data and polling on voters for the campaign and that were funded by Google’s Schmidt. Hillary for America spent more than $590,000 on services from The Groundwork and at least $48,000 on Civis Analytics in this campaign cycle. Clinton’s primary super PAC, Priorities USA, has spent more than $800,000 with Civis Analytics this cycle.

Who can the American people trust? The media is silent on real corruption opting to write and talk about wild conspiracies paid for by the Clinton’s. It is time to shut off cable news and research things for yourself.
We The Peoples News is committed to bringing you facts and truth. Please, share with people you know and help us expose the corruption of America!!~RJH

Author: We The People's News

Patriot fighting for freedom and rights . Weapon of choice the pen and 1st Amendment ! The Truth shall set you free~RJH

3 thoughts on “Google Used It’s Money And Power To Influence The 2016 Presidential Elections for Hillary.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: